http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/26/AR2010022603997.html?hpid=topnews
Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-Indiana) apparently isn't in trouble even though he got caught.
Although an investigation found evidence that campaign contributions were linked to earmarks of federal funds for the donors, the House Ethics Committee decided not to bother even asking him any questions.
So... what's the point of having an Ethics Committee?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
To add artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing Congress. (Well, very few are actualy bald, but the purpose remains.)
Post a Comment